A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT to amend the north carolina constitution to include the judicial standards commission and to amend the existing statutes on the judicial standards commission.
Whereas, the North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission has become increasingly partisan and secretive, and it is in the public interest to establish a fair, impartial, and transparent Commission that oversees implementation of the North Carolina Judicial Code of Conduct; Now, therefore,
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION
SECTION 1.(a)  Article IV of the North Carolina Constitution is amended by adding a new section to read:
"Sec. 23.  Judicial Standards Commission.
(1)	Membership. The Judicial Standards Commission shall consist of the following residents of this State:
(a)	Five judges appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as follows:
1.	One Court of Appeals judge.
2.	Two superior court judges.
3.	Two district court judges.
(b)	Five licensed attorneys appointed by the officers of the North Carolina State Bar.
(c)	Five citizens who are neither lawyers nor judges, active or retired, appointed by the Governor.
(2)	Public hearings and records. Any disciplinary hearings held before and sanctions imposed by the Commission as prescribed by law shall be made public."
SECTION 1.(b)  The amendment set out in subsection (a) of this section shall be submitted to the qualified voters of the State at the general election to be held on November 3, 2026, which election shall be conducted under the laws then governing elections in the State. Ballots, voting systems, or both may be used in accordance with Chapter 163 of the General Statutes. The question to be used in the voting systems and ballots shall be:
"[ ] FOR	[ ] AGAINST
Constitutional amendment to add the Judicial Standards Commission to the Constitution to ensure that complaints against judges and justices are handled in fair, transparent, and nonpartisan proceedings, and to require that the Commission's disciplinary hearings and sanctions be made public."
SECTION 1.(c)  The State Board of Elections shall certify the results of the referendum conducted under subsection (b) of this section. If a majority of votes cast on the question are in favor of the amendment set out in subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of State shall enroll the amendment among the permanent records of that office. If a majority of votes cast on the question are against the amendment set out in subsection (a) of this section, the amendment shall have no effect.
SECTION 1.(d)  If the certification from the State Board of Elections under subsection (c) of this section reflects that a majority of votes cast on the question are in favor of the amendment set out in subsection (a) of this section, the amendment set out in subsection (a) of this section is effective upon certification.

AMENDING JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION STATUTES
SECTION 2.  Article 30 of Chapter 7A of the General Statutes reads as rewritten:
"Article 30.
"Judicial Standards Commission.
"§ 7A‑374.1.  Purpose.
The purpose of this Article is to provide for the investigation and resolution of inquiries concerning the qualification or conduct of any judge or justice of the General Court of Justice. The procedure for discipline of any judge or justice of the General Court of Justice shall be in accordance with this Article and the North Carolina Constitution, Article IV, Section 23. Nothing in this Article shall affect the impeachment of judges under the North Carolina Constitution, Article IV, Sections 4 and 17.
…
"§ 7A‑375.  Judicial Standards Commission.

	

	

	

…
(b)	Vacancies. – A vacancy on the Commission arises upon the resignation or death of a member or if a member ceases to have the qualifications required for the member's appointment. Vacancies of members are filled in the same manner as the original appointment, for the remainder of the term.
(c)	Disability or Disqualification. – If a member of the Commission appointed by the Chief Justice or the officers of the State Bar becomes disabled, or becomes a respondent before the Commission, the Chief Justice or the officers of the State Bar, respectively, shall appoint an alternate member to serve during the period of disability or disqualification. The alternate member shall be from the same division of the General Court of Justice as the judge whose place the alternate member takes. If a member of the Commission becomes disabled or is disqualified from participating in a disciplinary proceeding, the Governor shall appoint an alternate member to serve during the period of disability or disqualification.
…
"§ 7A‑377.  Procedures.
…
(a1)	Unless otherwise waived by the justice or judge involved and except as provided herein, all papers filed with and proceedings before the Commission, including any investigation that the Commission may make, are confidential, and no person shall disclose information obtained from Commission proceedings or papers filed with or by the Commission, except as provided herein. Those papers are not subject to disclosure under Chapter 132 of the General Statutes.
…
(a5)	If, after an investigation is completed, the Commission concludes that disciplinary proceedings should be instituted, the notice and statement of charges filed by the Commission, along with the answer and all other pleadings, are no longer confidential and shall be made public. Disciplinary hearings ordered by the Commission shall be held publicly and recommendations of the Commission to the Supreme Court, along with the record filed in support of such recommendations, shall be made public. Testimony and other evidence presented to the Commission is privileged in any action for defamation. At least eight members of the Commission must concur in any recommendation to issue a public reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove any judge. A respondent who is recommended for public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal is entitled to a copy of the proposed record to be filed with the Supreme Court, and if the respondent has objections to it, to have the record settled by the Commission's chair. The respondent is also entitled to present a brief and to argue the respondent's case, in person and through counsel, to the Supreme Court. A majority of the members of the Supreme Court voting must concur in any order of public reprimand, censure, suspension, or removal. The Supreme Court may approve the recommendation, remand for further proceedings, or reject the recommendation. A justice of the Supreme Court or a member of the Commission who is a judge is disqualified from acting in any case in which he is a respondent.
	
…."

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 3.  Section 2 of this act becomes effective only if the constitutional amendment proposed by Section 1 of this act is approved. If the constitutional amendment is approved, Section 2 of this act becomes effective January 1, 2027. The remainder of this act is effective when it becomes law.